Editing
Richard Simon
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Reception=== The ''Histoire critique du Vieux Testament'' encountered strong opposition from Catholics who disliked Simon's diminishing of the authority of the [[Church Fathers]].<ref>Watson E. Mills, ''Mercer Commentary on the New Testament'' (2003), p. 42; [https://books.google.com/books?id=iNLZYtBEw0sC&pg=PA42&lpg=PA42 Google Books].</ref> Protestants widely felt that an infallible Bible was threatened by doubts which Simon raised against the integrity of the Hebrew text; and indeed Simon as basic tenets argued against ''[[sola scriptura]]''<ref name=CL>David Lyle Jeffrey, Gregory P. Maillet, ''Christianity and Literature: Philosophical Foundations and Critical Practice'' (2011), p. 221; [https://books.google.com/books?id=wG1d5yNrzXsC&pg=PA221 Google Books].</ref> and in favour of the Catholic Church tradition of interpretation. [[Jean Leclerc (theologian)|Jean Le Clerc]], in his 1685 work ''Sentimens de quelques théologiens de Hollande'', controverted the views of Simon acutely, and claimed that an uninformed reader might take Simon to be any of a Calvinist, Jew or crypto-Spinozan; Bossuet made a point of banning this also, as even more harmful than Simon's book.<ref>Israel, p. 100 and p. 452</ref> It was answered in ''Réponse aux Sentimens de quelques théologiens de Hollande'' by Simon (1686). In France, Simon's work became well known and widely circulated, despite Bossuet's hostility and efforts to keep it marginal. [[Étienne Fourmont]] was in effect a disciple of Simon, if not acknowledging the fact.<ref>William Johnstone, ''The Bible and the Enlightenment: a case study, Dr. Alexander Geddes (1737-1802)'' (2004), p. 89; [https://books.google.com/books?id=OY9A21fgtiIC&pg=PA89 Google Books].</ref> Another orientalist influenced by Simon was [[Nicolas Barat]].<ref>{{CathEncy|wstitle=Nicolas Barat}}</ref> The identity of the translator of the 1682 English version ''Critical History of the Old Testament'' is unclear, being often given as a Henry Dickinson who is an obscure figure, and sometimes as [[John Hampden (1653–1696)|John Hampden]]; [[John Dryden]] wrote his ''[[Religio Laici]]'' in response with a dedication to Dickinson,<ref name=CL/> and Simon's work became well known. [[Isaac Newton]] took an interest in Simon's New Testament criticism in the early 1690s, pointed out to him by [[John Locke]], adding from it to an [[Arian]] summary of his views that was intended for publication by Le Clerc, but remained in manuscript.<ref>[[Richard S. Westfall]], ''Never at Rest: A biography of Isaac Newton'' (1983), pp. 490–1.</ref> Later [[Samuel Clarke]] published his ''The Divine Authority of the Holy Scriptures Asserted'' (1699) in reply to Simon.<ref>{{ODNBweb|id=5529|title=Clarke, Samuel|first=David|last=Wilson}}</ref> Simon's works were later an influence on [[Johann Salomo Semler]].<ref>Joel B. Green, ''Hearing the New Testament: strategies for interpretation'' (1995), p. 12; [https://books.google.com/books?id=hR51imrUMG8C&pg=PA12 Google Books].</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Textus Receptus may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Textus Receptus:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information