Jack Moorman James White Debate

From Textus Receptus

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: ==External Links== * [http://greatbiblehoax.blogspot.com/2011/02/d-waite-comments-on-moorman-white.html D A Waite comments on the Moorman-White Debate])
Line 1: Line 1:
-
==External Links==
+
White moorman
 +
1 - A was not found near a bin
 +
 +
2 - Sdrivener changed only 191 places not 1800 as alluded
 +
 +
3 - white, the translatord didn't know about Byzantine and Alexandian text types
 +
 +
4 - he says the pilgrims detested the King james
 +
 +
5 - so we have to say there is no 100% bible because Bart Erhman and Islam want one?
 +
 +
6 - Did the KJV translators use different greek texts?
 +
 +
7 - They never suggested the KJV was not the final word?
 +
 +
8 - KJV scholars would not have joined modern scholars
 +
 +
9 - so if there is no byzantine readings before 5th century, why did church fathers quote them
 +
 +
10 - good point nomina sacra were for poor people to fit more on a page.
 +
 +
11 - 1 tim 3:16
 +
 +
12 - Granville sharp ? the KJV translators needed it?
 +
 +
13 - The Translators knew Latin thus didn't know the GS rule
 +
 +
14 - changes made to the 1611?
 +
 +
15 - rom 9:5 wrong change to the NKJV
 +
 +
16 - is kill in matt and murder in Rom wrong
 +
 +
17 - rev 16:5
 +
 +
18 - is the alexandrian text the majority in the first 100o years? Byzantine only in the last 1000
 +
 +
19 - he mentioned 2 i gave 105
 +
 +
20 -
 +
 +
==External Links==
 +
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTfiuksOwl4 Jack Moorman James White Debate You Tube]
* [http://greatbiblehoax.blogspot.com/2011/02/d-waite-comments-on-moorman-white.html D A Waite comments on the Moorman-White Debate]
* [http://greatbiblehoax.blogspot.com/2011/02/d-waite-comments-on-moorman-white.html D A Waite comments on the Moorman-White Debate]

Revision as of 10:15, 12 March 2013

White moorman

1 - A was not found near a bin

2 - Sdrivener changed only 191 places not 1800 as alluded

3 - white, the translatord didn't know about Byzantine and Alexandian text types

4 - he says the pilgrims detested the King james

5 - so we have to say there is no 100% bible because Bart Erhman and Islam want one?

6 - Did the KJV translators use different greek texts?

7 - They never suggested the KJV was not the final word?

8 - KJV scholars would not have joined modern scholars

9 - so if there is no byzantine readings before 5th century, why did church fathers quote them

10 - good point nomina sacra were for poor people to fit more on a page.

11 - 1 tim 3:16

12 - Granville sharp ? the KJV translators needed it?

13 - The Translators knew Latin thus didn't know the GS rule

14 - changes made to the 1611?

15 - rom 9:5 wrong change to the NKJV

16 - is kill in matt and murder in Rom wrong

17 - rev 16:5

18 - is the alexandrian text the majority in the first 100o years? Byzantine only in the last 1000

19 - he mentioned 2 i gave 105

20 -

External Links

Retrieved from "http://mail.textus-receptus.com/wiki/Jack_Moorman_James_White_Debate"
Personal tools