Conservative Version, A

From Textus Receptus

Revision as of 17:32, 19 August 2009 (view source) Nick (Talk | contribs) m (Protected "Conservative Version, A" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 06:51, 7 February 2010 (view source) Textus Receptus (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	http://www.bible.net.au	+	'''A Conservative Version'''
		+
		+	'''A Conservative Version''' (ACV) is the name of a Bible which was translated by Walter L. Porter. As the name suggests, it is a very conservative translation. That is, it is a very literal translation, very much following formal equivalence translation principles. Walter L. Porter was a professor of psychology at Harding University for 24 years, and was born in Fort Smith, Arkansas, in 1932. He strongly opposes dynamic equivalence. He was quoted as saying in his website: "Finally, a word of warning about modern English translations. Most of them (including the popular  NIV) distort the original text of the Bible with many changes. The authors of those translations use the so-called "dynamic equivalent" method, which is simply a flattering euphemism for loose translating."
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+	Related links:
		+
		+	http://www.stillvoices.org/

---

Revision as of 06:51, 7 February 2010

A Conservative Version

A Conservative Version (ACV) is the name of a Bible which was translated by Walter L. Porter. As the name suggests, it is a very conservative translation. That is, it is a very literal translation, very much following formal equivalence translation principles. Walter L. Porter was a professor of psychology at Harding University for 24 years, and was born in Fort Smith, Arkansas, in 1932. He strongly opposes dynamic equivalence. He was quoted as saying in his website: "Finally, a word of warning about modern English translations. Most of them (including the popular NIV) distort the original text of the Bible with many changes. The authors of those translations use the so-called "dynamic equivalent" method, which is simply a flattering euphemism for loose translating."

Related links:

http://www.stillvoices.org/