Minuscule 412
From Textus Receptus
(New page: '''Minuscule 412''' (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), ε 419 (in the Soden numbering), is a Greek...) |
m (Protected "Minuscule 412" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) |
Revision as of 13:06, 7 May 2010
Minuscule 412 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), ε 419 (in the Soden numbering), is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, on parchment. Dated by a colophon to the year 1301.[1]
Contents |
Description
The codex contains a complete text of the four Gospels on 329 parchment leaves (17.7 cm by 13 cm). Written in one column per page, in 22 lines per page.[1] It contains Epistula ad Carpianum, Eusebian tables, Prolegomena, tables of κεφαλαια, τιτλοι, κεφαλαια, Ammonian Sections, Eusebian Canons, Synaxarion, Menologion, and στιχοι.[2] John 1:1-14 was added by a later hand.[2]
Text
The Greek text of the codex is a representative of the Byzantine text-type. Aland placed it in Category V.[3]
History
The manuscript was written by Theodore, a scribe.[2] Wiedmann and J. G. J. Braun collated portions of the manuscript for Scholz (1794-1852).[4] The manuscript was added to the list of New Testament manuscripts by Scholz.[5]
The manuscript is currently housed at the Biblioteca Marciana (Gr. I. 19) in Venice.[1]
See also
References
- 1. Aland, K.; M. Welte, B. Köster, K. Junack (1994). Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. p. 71. ISBN 3110119862.
- 2. Gregory, Caspar René (1900). Textkritik des Neuen Testaments, Vol. 1. Leipzig. p. 187.
- 3. Aland, Kurt; Barbara Aland; Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.) (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 139. ISBN 978-0-8028-4098-1.
- 4. Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (1894). A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament. 1. London. p. 236.
- 5. Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (1894). A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament. 1. London. p. 225.
