Family Kx
From Textus Receptus
(→Members of the family: more manuscripts, though still not all) |
(→Description) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The group was discovered by [[Hermann von Soden]] and designated by him with symbol K<sup>x</sup>. The only distinction von Soden made among K<sup>x</sup> members was according to the presence and type of the [[Jesus and the woman taken in adultery|Pericope adulterae]]. Due to the massive influence od the group on other groups and its lack of control, the boundaries of group remain blurred.[3] The most problematic is the question, how many K<sup>x</sup> readings can be missing and how many surplus readings can be added before a manuscript no longer deserves to be classified as K<sup>x</sup>?[3] | The group was discovered by [[Hermann von Soden]] and designated by him with symbol K<sup>x</sup>. The only distinction von Soden made among K<sup>x</sup> members was according to the presence and type of the [[Jesus and the woman taken in adultery|Pericope adulterae]]. Due to the massive influence od the group on other groups and its lack of control, the boundaries of group remain blurred.[3] The most problematic is the question, how many K<sup>x</sup> readings can be missing and how many surplus readings can be added before a manuscript no longer deserves to be classified as K<sup>x</sup>?[3] | ||
| - | The group profiles of K<sup>x</sup> are: | + | The group profiles of K<sup>x</sup> proposed by Frederick Wisse are: |
* [[Luke 1:6]].[[Luke 1:34|34]] | * [[Luke 1:6]].[[Luke 1:34|34]] | ||
* [[Luke 10]]:([[Luke 10:3|3]]).[[Luke 10:15|15]].[[Luke 10:18|18]].[[Luke 10:23|23]].([[Luke 10:44|44]]).[[Luke 10:57|57]].([[Luke 10:60|60]]) | * [[Luke 10]]:([[Luke 10:3|3]]).[[Luke 10:15|15]].[[Luke 10:18|18]].[[Luke 10:23|23]].([[Luke 10:44|44]]).[[Luke 10:57|57]].([[Luke 10:60|60]]) | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 12 July 2009
Family Kx is a large group of the New Testament manuscripts. It belongs to the Byzantine text-type as one of the textual families of this group. It has no uncials, no early minuscules, it has only hundreds of minuscules.
Contents |
Description
The group was discovered by Hermann von Soden and designated by him with symbol Kx. The only distinction von Soden made among Kx members was according to the presence and type of the Pericope adulterae. Due to the massive influence od the group on other groups and its lack of control, the boundaries of group remain blurred.[3] The most problematic is the question, how many Kx readings can be missing and how many surplus readings can be added before a manuscript no longer deserves to be classified as Kx?[3]
The group profiles of Kx proposed by Frederick Wisse are:
According to von Soden the group Kx in the 10th century evolved.
The group probably evolved from Family E. The text of the group is not so easy to distinct as groups Kr and K1. Von Soden included to this group these Kappa manuscripts, which are not classified as Kr or Ki.[3]
The Textus Receptus was created on the basis of the manuscripts of this group.
Members of the family
Codex Seidelianus II, 2, 3, 8, 14, 45, 47, 49, 51, 54, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 73, 75, 76, 78, 84, 89, 96, 99, 219, 272, 301, 373, 358, 360, 412, 439, 529, 568, 778, 864, 875, 877, 939, 971, 1069, 1076, 1417, 1452, 1474, 1569, 1671, 1693, 2112, 2217, 2455, 2649.[5]
See also
References
- 1. H. von Soden Die Schriften, I/2, p. 713.
- 2. H. von Soden Die Schriften, I/2, pp. 734-757.
- 3. F. Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, p. 94.
- 4. H. von Soden Die Schriften, I/2, p. 718.
- 5. F. Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, pp. 95-99.
Further reading
- Hermann von Soden, Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments, in ihrer ältesten erreichbaren Textgestalt hergestellt auf Grund ihrer Textgeschichte, Verlag von Arthur Glaue, Berlin 1902-1910, pp. 713-757.
- F. Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, pp. 94-99.
