Edward F. Hills
From Textus Receptus
(Difference between revisions)
(→See Also) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | [[ | + | '''Edward Freer Hills''' (1912–1981) was an American [[Presbyterian]] scholar, perhaps the greatest 20th Century Traditional (“Byzantine”) Text, and [[Textus Receptus|Received Text]] defender.<sup>[1]</sup><sup>[2]</sup> Dr. Hills integrates his theological perspective alongside New Testament criticism. |
| + | |||
| + | Reading Dean [[John William Burgon]] inspired Dr. Hills to approach textual criticism from a “logic of faith” (1952 is the year that Dr. Hills made a definite commitment to this view).<sup>[3]</sup> As to the relationship of the King James Bible to the Received Text, Hills wrote "the King James Version ought to be regarded not merely as a translation of the Textus Receptus but also as an independent variety of the Textus Receptus."<sup>[4]</sup> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Education== | ||
| + | *Graduated summa cum laude at Yale University (1930–1933)<sup>[5]</sup><sup>[6]</sup> | ||
| + | *Th.D. from Westminster Theological Seminary (ca. 1935) | ||
| + | *Th.M. from Columbia Theological Seminary | ||
| + | *Th.D. in New Testament textual criticism from Harvard under the supervision of Henry J. Cadbury, [[Kirsopp_Lake |Kirsopp Lake]] as one of the readers<sup>[7]</sup> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Books by Dr. Hills== | ||
| + | *''The King James Version Defended: A Christian View of the New Testament Manuscripts'' (1956). ISBN 0-915923-00-9. | ||
| + | **An online version of his book is available here [http://www.oldpathspublications.org/textus.html] and here [http://e-sword-users.org/users/node/3739] and in HTML at [http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/kjvdefen.htm] | ||
| + | *''Believing Bible Study''. First edition, 1967; Second edition, 1977, Third edition, 1991. ISBN 0-915923-01-7. | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [[The King James Bible Defended]] | * [[The King James Bible Defended]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Notes== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * 1. One Bible only?: examining exclusive claims for the King James Bible Roy E. Beacham, Kevin T. Bauder p48 - 2001 "Edward F. Hills - Another individual who made a sizable contribution to the KingJames-Only movement, although not drawing directly from the works of Wilkinson and Ray, is Edward F. Hills (1912-1981). Hills actually possessed genuine ..." | ||
| + | * 2. James D. Price (who isn't a KJO proponent) alludes to this in: [http://books.google.com/books?id=hL4XgUSGP8sC&pg=PA263 ''King James Onlyism: A New Sect'', 2006 pg. 263] | ||
| + | * 3. This statement can be seen in the 2nd to last paragraph of [http://www.wayoflife.org/database/edwardfhills.html The Testimony of Dr. Edward F. Hills] by David Cloud | ||
| + | * 4. [http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/kjvdcha8.htm (King James Version Defended, Ch. 8)] | ||
| + | * 5. See the Robert Barnett's contribution at http://www.deanburgonsociety.org/KJBible/barnett91.htm. | ||
| + | * 6. I am assuming since Dr. Hills mentioned that he was a sophomore at Yale in 1931, that would mean his years of study at Yale would most likely be around 1930-33. | ||
| + | * 7. [http://www.holywordcafe.com/bible/resources/HILLSREVISITED.pdf ''Hills Revisited ''] by John Whitmer | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{DEFAULTSORT:Hills, Edward F.}} | ||
| + | [[Category:King James Only movement]] | ||
Revision as of 09:10, 10 March 2013
Edward Freer Hills (1912–1981) was an American Presbyterian scholar, perhaps the greatest 20th Century Traditional (“Byzantine”) Text, and Received Text defender.[1][2] Dr. Hills integrates his theological perspective alongside New Testament criticism.
Reading Dean John William Burgon inspired Dr. Hills to approach textual criticism from a “logic of faith” (1952 is the year that Dr. Hills made a definite commitment to this view).[3] As to the relationship of the King James Bible to the Received Text, Hills wrote "the King James Version ought to be regarded not merely as a translation of the Textus Receptus but also as an independent variety of the Textus Receptus."[4]
Contents |
Education
- Graduated summa cum laude at Yale University (1930–1933)[5][6]
- Th.D. from Westminster Theological Seminary (ca. 1935)
- Th.M. from Columbia Theological Seminary
- Th.D. in New Testament textual criticism from Harvard under the supervision of Henry J. Cadbury, Kirsopp Lake as one of the readers[7]
Books by Dr. Hills
- The King James Version Defended: A Christian View of the New Testament Manuscripts (1956). ISBN 0-915923-00-9.
- Believing Bible Study. First edition, 1967; Second edition, 1977, Third edition, 1991. ISBN 0-915923-01-7.
See Also
Notes
- 1. One Bible only?: examining exclusive claims for the King James Bible Roy E. Beacham, Kevin T. Bauder p48 - 2001 "Edward F. Hills - Another individual who made a sizable contribution to the KingJames-Only movement, although not drawing directly from the works of Wilkinson and Ray, is Edward F. Hills (1912-1981). Hills actually possessed genuine ..."
- 2. James D. Price (who isn't a KJO proponent) alludes to this in: King James Onlyism: A New Sect, 2006 pg. 263
- 3. This statement can be seen in the 2nd to last paragraph of The Testimony of Dr. Edward F. Hills by David Cloud
- 4. (King James Version Defended, Ch. 8)
- 5. See the Robert Barnett's contribution at http://www.deanburgonsociety.org/KJBible/barnett91.htm.
- 6. I am assuming since Dr. Hills mentioned that he was a sophomore at Yale in 1931, that would mean his years of study at Yale would most likely be around 1930-33.
- 7. Hills Revisited by John Whitmer
