Jack Moorman James White Debate

From Textus Receptus

Revision as of 10:15, 12 March 2013 by Nick (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

White moorman

1 - A was not found near a bin

2 - Sdrivener changed only 191 places not 1800 as alluded

3 - white, the translatord didn't know about Byzantine and Alexandian text types

4 - he says the pilgrims detested the King james

5 - so we have to say there is no 100% bible because Bart Erhman and Islam want one?

6 - Did the KJV translators use different greek texts?

7 - They never suggested the KJV was not the final word?

8 - KJV scholars would not have joined modern scholars

9 - so if there is no byzantine readings before 5th century, why did church fathers quote them

10 - good point nomina sacra were for poor people to fit more on a page.

11 - 1 tim 3:16

12 - Granville sharp ? the KJV translators needed it?

13 - The Translators knew Latin thus didn't know the GS rule

14 - changes made to the 1611?

15 - rom 9:5 wrong change to the NKJV

16 - is kill in matt and murder in Rom wrong

17 - rev 16:5

18 - is the alexandrian text the majority in the first 100o years? Byzantine only in the last 1000

19 - he mentioned 2 i gave 105

20 -

External Links