The Facts on the King James Only Debate
From Textus Receptus
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[image:facts on the king james only debate.jpg|thumb|150px|The Facts on the King James Only Debate by [[John Ankerberg]]]] | [[image:facts on the king james only debate.jpg|thumb|150px|The Facts on the King James Only Debate by [[John Ankerberg]]]] | ||
| - | The Facts on the King James Only Debate is written by [[John Ankerberg]]. It askes and claims: ''Is the King James Bible the most accurate version? Readers will discover what texts the King James Version’s translators used, what they said about their work, how the King James Version compares to other modern translations, and more.'' | + | The Facts on the King James Only Debate is written by [[John Ankerberg]] and [[John Weldon]]. It askes and claims: ''Is the King James Bible the most accurate version? Readers will discover what texts the King James Version’s translators used, what they said about their work, how the King James Version compares to other modern translations, and more.'' |
Ankerberg claims that all versions are the Word of God and overlooks many strong arguments for the [[King james Version]]. He mostly answered critics from hyper KJVO backgrounds but failed to give correct answers on many topics. | Ankerberg claims that all versions are the Word of God and overlooks many strong arguments for the [[King james Version]]. He mostly answered critics from hyper KJVO backgrounds but failed to give correct answers on many topics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Authors: Dr. John Ankerberg, Dr. John Weldon | ||
| + | |||
| + | Description: Delve into important translation and related issues. | ||
| + | |||
| + | •What is Biblical inerrancy? | ||
| + | |||
| + | •How are translations made? | ||
| + | |||
| + | •How does the King James version compare with more recent versions? | ||
| + | |||
| + | •Which translation is best for you. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==The Introduction== | ||
| + | |||
| + | :"...we can still know that the copies, collectively taken, give us one hundred percent of the original manuscripts. This means nothing has been lost of God's original inspiration and that we retain 100 percent of the inerrant Word of God." (page 7) | ||
Revision as of 09:05, 18 March 2011
The Facts on the King James Only Debate is written by John Ankerberg and John Weldon. It askes and claims: Is the King James Bible the most accurate version? Readers will discover what texts the King James Version’s translators used, what they said about their work, how the King James Version compares to other modern translations, and more.
Ankerberg claims that all versions are the Word of God and overlooks many strong arguments for the King james Version. He mostly answered critics from hyper KJVO backgrounds but failed to give correct answers on many topics.
Authors: Dr. John Ankerberg, Dr. John Weldon
Description: Delve into important translation and related issues.
•What is Biblical inerrancy?
•How are translations made?
•How does the King James version compare with more recent versions?
•Which translation is best for you.
The Introduction
- "...we can still know that the copies, collectively taken, give us one hundred percent of the original manuscripts. This means nothing has been lost of God's original inspiration and that we retain 100 percent of the inerrant Word of God." (page 7)
