The King James Only Controversy

From Textus Receptus

Revision as of 08:15, 29 January 2016 (view source) Nick (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Current revision (11:44, 29 January 2016) (view source) Nick (Talk | contribs) (Redirecting to The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?)
(One intermediate revision not shown.)
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	The King James Only Controversy is a book written by [[James White]] in an attempt to smear all King James Version and Textus Receptus supporters as weird, kooky, and generally illiterate.	+	#REDIRECT [[The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?]]
-		+
-	==Errors==	+
-		+
-	[[James White]] in his book, [[The King James Only Controversy]], on page 270 he incorrectly says of the first rule: “His rule only applies to persons, not things.” but in Durham’s book, on page 22, he clearly states under the section, “Sharp’s first rule regularly applied to things”:	+
-		+
-	:Thirty-three verses were found in which Sharp’s rule was applied to things rather than persons. These verses were subdivided according to five categories: (1) Entities, (2) Characteristics, (3) Activities, (4) Locations, and (5) Times.	+
-		+
-	To give a few brief examples from the book:	+
-		+
-	:(1) Acts 1:25 “this ministry and apostleship”; Acts 2:23 “the predetermined plan and foreknowledge”.	+
-	:(2) Mark 8:38 “this adulterous and sinful generation”; Mark 16:14 “their unbelief and hardness of heart”.	+
-	:(3) Hebrews 6:7 “that drinks…and brings forth”.	+
-	:(4) Matthew 23:37 “who kills…and stones”.	+
-	:(5) Matthew 24:36 “that day and hour”; Acts 2:20 “the great and glorious day”.	+

---

Current revision

1. REDIRECT The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?