Japanese Portal
From Textus Receptus
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==From Facebook== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Japanese bible page was designed to be a new TR version., but someone came along (I am not sure who) and have put in the 1928 Naoji Nagai version which is TR based, which is ok, but I will change this later, to be it's own version and the TRV page will be separate, but this will take a small bit of computer programming. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Someone did some work in 1 John but it was scorned by others as very poor. So the link page below is a little bit muddled, but I thought I would let it flow, because no one else seemed to be working on it. I figured if the 1928 is in the website, then that can be a good base to translate from. | ||
| + | |||
| + | http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Japanese_Textus_Receptus_Version | ||
| + | |||
| + | I know several people who are interested in the Japanese "TR" project. Basically it will basically be a Japanese "KJV" project. Some make large distinctions between the TR and KJV, but I am also collating the 1598 of Beza and comparing the 1881 of Scrivener. There is very little difference. | ||
| + | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Revision as of 12:06, 2 March 2013
From Facebook
The Japanese bible page was designed to be a new TR version., but someone came along (I am not sure who) and have put in the 1928 Naoji Nagai version which is TR based, which is ok, but I will change this later, to be it's own version and the TRV page will be separate, but this will take a small bit of computer programming.
Someone did some work in 1 John but it was scorned by others as very poor. So the link page below is a little bit muddled, but I thought I would let it flow, because no one else seemed to be working on it. I figured if the 1928 is in the website, then that can be a good base to translate from.
http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Japanese_Textus_Receptus_Version
I know several people who are interested in the Japanese "TR" project. Basically it will basically be a Japanese "KJV" project. Some make large distinctions between the TR and KJV, but I am also collating the 1598 of Beza and comparing the 1881 of Scrivener. There is very little difference.
See Also
