Edward F. Hills
From Textus Receptus
(Difference between revisions)
(→See Also) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
* [[The King James Bible Defended]] | * [[The King James Bible Defended]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==External Links== | ||
+ | * [http://ntnews7.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-anti-kjvonyists-pussyfoot-around-e.html How anti-KJVOnyists pussyfoot around E. F. Hills] | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== |
Revision as of 20:37, 5 January 2016
Edward Freer Hills (1912–1981) was an American Presbyterian scholar, perhaps the greatest 20th Century Traditional (“Byzantine”) Text, and Received Text defender.[1][2] Dr. Hills integrates his theological perspective alongside New Testament criticism.
Reading Dean John William Burgon inspired Dr. Hills to approach textual criticism from a “logic of faith” (1952 is the year that Dr. Hills made a definite commitment to this view).[3] As to the relationship of the King James Bible to the Received Text, Hills wrote "the King James Version ought to be regarded not merely as a translation of the Textus Receptus but also as an independent variety of the Textus Receptus."[4]
Contents |
Education
- Graduated summa cum laude at Yale University (1930–1933)[5][6]
- Th.D. from Westminster Theological Seminary (ca. 1935)
- Th.M. from Columbia Theological Seminary
- Th.D. in New Testament textual criticism from Harvard under the supervision of Henry J. Cadbury, Kirsopp Lake as one of the readers[7]
Books by Dr. Hills
- The King James Version Defended: A Christian View of the New Testament Manuscripts (1956). ISBN 0-915923-00-9.
- Believing Bible Study. First edition, 1967; Second edition, 1977, Third edition, 1991. ISBN 0-915923-01-7.
See Also
External Links
Notes
- 1. One Bible only?: examining exclusive claims for the King James Bible Roy E. Beacham, Kevin T. Bauder p48 - 2001 "Edward F. Hills - Another individual who made a sizable contribution to the KingJames-Only movement, although not drawing directly from the works of Wilkinson and Ray, is Edward F. Hills (1912-1981). Hills actually possessed genuine ..."
- 2. James D. Price (who isn't a KJO proponent) alludes to this in: King James Onlyism: A New Sect, 2006 pg. 263
- 3. This statement can be seen in the 2nd to last paragraph of The Testimony of Dr. Edward F. Hills by David Cloud
- 4. (King James Version Defended, Ch. 8)
- 5. See the Robert Barnett's contribution at http://www.deanburgonsociety.org/KJBible/barnett91.htm.
- 6. I am assuming since Dr. Hills mentioned that he was a sophomore at Yale in 1931, that would mean his years of study at Yale would most likely be around 1930-33.
- 7. Hills Revisited by John Whitmer